Understanding how consumers map their experiences with human relationships onto brands.
Attributing human traits, emotions, or intentions to non-human entities.
A brand that you use or have used which meets the following characteristics: the brand just doesn’t treat you right; the brand does not seem to value you as a customer; no matter what you do to change or ignore the situation, the wrongful treatment continues just the same.
A brand that you adamantly refuse to buy, support, or use. You think of this brand as an opponent or rival. This is a brand that you are actively against.
A brand that you are committed to in some significant and lasting way. This is a brand that you expect to be using for years to come. Although your brand has competitors, you stick only with “your brand.”
A brand that you go out of your way to support. This is a brand that you really care about. You have a strong desire to help this brand succeed in the marketplace.
A brand that you “cannot live without.” This is a brand you feel is truly irreplaceable. It is uncomfortable for you to think about being separated from this brand for a long period, or being prevented from using it ever again.
A brand that you buy and use regularly and that meets the following characteristics: this brand provides a straightforward benefit for a reasonable cost; this brand simply “does the job” … nothing less, nothing more.
A brand you use on a regular basis, but are somehow “stuck with,” trapped into using, or otherwise forced to use. This is a brand that you would say you use only because there is no alternative that is available to you and readily accessible. This is a brand that you wish you didn’t “have to” purchase or use. You would probably not select this brand if you had other options.
A brand whose usage you downplay or keep hidden from certain others for one reason or another. While you may use this brand regulrarly or often, this is a brand that you really do not want others associating with you in any significant way.